Yesterday a federal judge in Florida hearing the lawsuit by 26 states against what everyone now calls "Obamacare" ruled that the individual mandate is unconstitutional. He went further, taking the government's argument that without the mandate the law was unimplementable and agreed thereby throwing out the entire law and issuing a de facto injunction against implementation.
However, not hours later did the regime already show its condescension for the law by attempting to justify its intent to defy the court. The regime's only course of action is to comply with the ruling until they appeal. This is not the Third World where the dictator trashes a so-called independent judiciary and over rules them. This isn't a democracy where you can say the people don't agree. This is a republic where each branch of government has checks and balances against each other and if the democrats want to over rule the judicial ruling without appealing then their only option is to start over and rewrite the legislation and make it legal under the Constitution.
If Obama and his minions take any other path than the two mentioned above, it's time to drag this regime before that court and declare them in contempt and once done, remove them from office through the allowed Constitutional process. This is not a game folks. These are serious transgressions against the republic and Constitution and puts our freedom in a precarious state. It cannot be tolerated by any president not matter who they are or what label or mantle they wear.
Otherwise the law means nothing anymore, and we see in Tunisia, Egypt and other places, past and present what results. And the United States of America is better than that; the people are better than that, and the rule of law must be respected.
Showing posts with label hypocrisy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label hypocrisy. Show all posts
Tuesday, February 1, 2011
Tuesday, December 8, 2009
You're Against Government Run Healthcare?
Then you're not just a racist. You're a racist misogynist too. And it must be true because that genius Harry Reid says so.
In a statement that compared people who are against things like a mathematical formula that puts a monetary value on a human life depending on how healthy you are or what kind of disabilities you may have with people against ending the slave trade and allowing women the right to vote. Historically of course, it was the Democratic party that was against ending segregation and civil rights, but anyone smart enough to come here to read this already knows that.
I don't know about you, but it seems to me, logically that stance hasn't changed much. Except now the Democrats are for discriminating against people with disabilities and other conditions with pushing this government run health care with the built in formula for determining who gets care and who doesn't. Yes, the famous death panels, or rationing of care. It's funny how easy it is to see through the lies and rhetoric when you actually pay attention and use logic to deconstruct what is said and what actually is written in these bills, isn't it?
In a statement that compared people who are against things like a mathematical formula that puts a monetary value on a human life depending on how healthy you are or what kind of disabilities you may have with people against ending the slave trade and allowing women the right to vote. Historically of course, it was the Democratic party that was against ending segregation and civil rights, but anyone smart enough to come here to read this already knows that.
I don't know about you, but it seems to me, logically that stance hasn't changed much. Except now the Democrats are for discriminating against people with disabilities and other conditions with pushing this government run health care with the built in formula for determining who gets care and who doesn't. Yes, the famous death panels, or rationing of care. It's funny how easy it is to see through the lies and rhetoric when you actually pay attention and use logic to deconstruct what is said and what actually is written in these bills, isn't it?
Monday, August 31, 2009
Hypocritical Politicians Striking Again
This time in Massachusetts. With the death of Senator Kennedy, Democrats now want to change the state law so the Democratic governor can appoint a new Democrat to fill the vacant Senate seat. The goal of course is to get the Democrats back to the 60 votes they need to ram any bill down the throats of the American people.
This might not be controversial in itself except for the fact that just five years ago they had changed this law regarding a replacement from gubernatorial appointment to special election. Way back then the Democrats were running John Kerry against President Bush in the 2004 presidential election. Fully expecting victory over Bush and a vacant Senate seat as a result, the Democrats wanted to ensure that then governor Mitt Romney, a Republican, could not appoint a Republican to replace Kerry if he indeed won the White House. And now that Massachusetts again has a Democrat for a governor it is apparently okay for the governor to appoint a replacement. So now they want to change it back!
This all in response to the dying plea of Senator Kennedy. The real gas is Kennedy was a big pusher of the change back in 2004. So, in other words, governor appointments are un-American when your governor is NOT of your own party; we have to have an election. Yet appointments are very good when you have a governor on your own side. How convenient. You just have to love it.
This might not be controversial in itself except for the fact that just five years ago they had changed this law regarding a replacement from gubernatorial appointment to special election. Way back then the Democrats were running John Kerry against President Bush in the 2004 presidential election. Fully expecting victory over Bush and a vacant Senate seat as a result, the Democrats wanted to ensure that then governor Mitt Romney, a Republican, could not appoint a Republican to replace Kerry if he indeed won the White House. And now that Massachusetts again has a Democrat for a governor it is apparently okay for the governor to appoint a replacement. So now they want to change it back!
This all in response to the dying plea of Senator Kennedy. The real gas is Kennedy was a big pusher of the change back in 2004. So, in other words, governor appointments are un-American when your governor is NOT of your own party; we have to have an election. Yet appointments are very good when you have a governor on your own side. How convenient. You just have to love it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)